博客來This book is a scathing critique of the work of N.E.S.A. Hamilton, who challenged the authenticity of the annotations in the famous Shakespearean scholar J. Payne Collier’s annotated edition of the Shakespeare Folio 1632. The authors, Alexander and Charles Rivington, mount a rigorous defense of Collier’s work, arguing that Hamilton’s claims are unfounded and that Collier’s annotations are of great historical and literary significance.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it.
This work is in the ＂public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
