Air Support for AirLand Battle

This monograph explores the question of whether current Air Force doctrine for the control of air support best supports AirLand Battle doctrine. In addressing the question this study looks at what is current Air Force doctrine for the control of air support and what are its historical antecedents. Next it identifies the operational aspects of AirLand Battle doctrine and its requirements for air support. The study then surfaces current issues concerning the control of air support and concludes with an assessment of current Air Force doctrine for the control of air support as it relates to AirLand Battle. This monograph concludes that though in the broadest terms Air Force doctrine and AirLand Battle doctrine are compatible they differ on some key points. Air Force doctrine takes a theater perspective, visualizing joint warfare as being made up of one air campaign and one land campaign. Airland Battle doctrine takes a lower level perspective and sees little segregation between the air and ground campaign. The two doctrines differ in emphasis in the areas of agility, synchronization, and unity of effort. These differences cause the two doctrines to be not as compatible as they should be. This study recommends that the Air Force and Army come to an agreement on their understanding of the battlefield end develop a common perspective. It suggests that doctrine and procedures for the control of air support should emphasize maneuver, agility, and flexibility.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.