The Air Force Officer and the Constitution

The oath of office binds Air Force officers to sacrifice their lives and the lives of those under their command to ＂support and defend the Constitution; against all enemies, foreign and domestic.＂ A robust knowledge of the Constitution must be a prerequisite for commissioned officer service. By clearly mapping the line of responsibility from the Constitution through the oath to the officer and demonstrating the moral and ethical demands placed on the officer by the contractual nature of the oath of office, a clear case is demonstrated that the Constitution must command a keen, common, standard understanding by newly commissioned USAF officers. An overview of the variety and lack of a minimum standard of constitutional content in commissioning source curricula along with a demonstrated lack of constitutional knowledge by Officer Training School graduates cements the need for a USAF-wide standard. Lastly, a recommendation is made to establish a minimum standard for constitutional mastery to ensure Air Force leaders fulfill their ethical obligation to ensure future officers have the best possible understanding of the Constitution, so they may successfully fulfill their oath to support and defend the Constitution.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.